Hallahan, Jim

Game Details

Born: Sat 16-Dec-1911

Died: Wed 23-Nov-1994

Name Notes:

Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Hallahan,_Jr.

Comment:

Footscray 1935-1937 - 17 Games, Brighton c1934,1937-1938, Fitzroy 1942-1944 - 32 Games

Game Details
Year Team Pl Po G
1940 Brighton 14 0 30
1941 Brighton 20 0 6
Total Brighton 34 0 36
Total Overall 34 0 36
Game Details
Year Representing Round Opposition OppositionKey AheadBehind OnfieldPosition Played Goals Points Comment
1940 Brighton 1 SANDRINGHAM W FF Y 4
1940 Brighton 3 COBURG W FF Y 4
1940 Brighton 4 OAKLEIGH L FF Y 3
1940 Brighton 5 BRUNSWICK L FF Y 2
1940 Brighton 6 YARRAVILLE L HFF Y
1940 Brighton 7 CAMBERWELL W HFF Y 1
1940 Brighton 8 PORT MELBOURNE L HFF Y 2
1940 Brighton 9 PRESTON L FP Y 4
1940 Brighton 10 NORTHCOTE W FP Y 7
1940 Brighton 13 WILLIAMSTOWN L C Y 1
1940 Brighton 16 BRUNSWICK L Rov Y 2
1940 Brighton 17 YARRAVILLE W C Y
1940 Brighton 19 NORTHCOTE L C Y
1940 Brighton 20 PRAHRAN L C Y
Total 14 30
Year Representing Round Opposition OppositionKey AheadBehind OnfieldPosition Played Goals Points Comment
1941 Brighton 1 Sandringham W C Y 1
1941 Brighton 2 Oakleigh W C Y
1941 Brighton 3 Prahran L C Y
1941 Brighton 4 Port Melbourne L C Y
1941 Brighton 5 Camberwell L C Y
1941 Brighton 6 Williamstown L C Y
1941 Brighton 7 Preston L C Y
1941 Brighton 8 Brunswick L C Y 1
1941 Brighton 9 Yarraville W C Y
1941 Brighton 10 Coburg L C Y
1941 Brighton 11 Northcote W C Y
1941 Brighton 13 Oakleigh L C Y 1
1941 Brighton 12 Sandringham W C Y
1941 Brighton 14 Prahran L C Y
1941 Brighton 15 Port Melbourne L C Y
1941 Brighton 16 Camberwell W C Y
1941 Brighton 17 Williamstown L C Y 1
1941 Brighton 18 Yarraville L C Y 1
1941 Brighton 19 Coburg L C Y 1
1941 Brighton 20 Northcote L C Y
Total 20 6


Many Games are reported in year by year lists even if the player did not play in the game. This can be a questionable record that is still to be determined, or may represent a newspaper record that the player did not play that game. Sometimes it is useful to know that the player was actually absent.